Magna Owners Of Texas

Public Forums => The Garage => Topic started by: hootmon on September 25, 2008, 03:31:23 PM

Title: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: hootmon on September 25, 2008, 03:31:23 PM
Here is a 5 Gal tank that is not from a Valk..

(http://i37.tinypic.com/2qx2i41.jpg)

http://www.bestbits.org/magna/fattank/index.htm (http://www.bestbits.org/magna/fattank/index.htm)

The referrence to where he got the tank does not seem to be valid anymore...
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Magniac on September 25, 2008, 05:09:55 PM
A friend of mine in Vancouver BC makes 5-gal tanks for the Magna. I don't think he has a website yet, but you can e-mail him at  Ian.Flanders@shaw.ca  and he can send you pics. He does a fantastic job, and even puts on stock Honda graphics.

Maybe someone who knows how to post pics on here could have him send some.
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: roboto65 on September 25, 2008, 05:59:09 PM
Yep can post if you have some or you can get a Photobucket account
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: thegoochking on September 25, 2008, 07:40:17 PM
The tank on that bike was made by a company called fat tank. I dont think they are in business anymore.
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: dgc67 on September 26, 2008, 10:45:04 AM
It sure would be nice to have a longer range, but if you do this you need/must remember it WILL change handling characterics.  Especially on a full tank.  You will have more weight on your front wheel and a higher center of gravity.  I know we all feel a difference when we have a passenger, but tweaking the rear suspension is much easier than the front and the change will be greatly affecting the front suspension.  My opinion/thoughts of course (which have more than once been proven wrong)  ;-)
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: TLRam1 on September 29, 2008, 02:01:18 AM
Magniac's friend - Ian's Tank. 925.00

(http://i471.photobucket.com/albums/rr80/MOOT-Photos/Magna%20Tank/101_0119.jpg)

(http://i471.photobucket.com/albums/rr80/MOOT-Photos/Magna%20Tank/101_0127.jpg)

(http://i471.photobucket.com/albums/rr80/MOOT-Photos/Magna%20Tank/101_0133.jpg)

(http://i471.photobucket.com/albums/rr80/MOOT-Photos/Magna%20Tank/101_0130.jpg)


Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: roboto65 on September 29, 2008, 06:43:03 AM
 :shock: No Photos :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on September 29, 2008, 10:43:11 AM
I got some photos from Ian as well  here is a link
http://www.echological.com/jester/tank1.jpg (http://www.echological.com/jester/tank1.jpg) 
http://www.echological.com/jester/tank2.jpg (http://www.echological.com/jester/tank2.jpg)
http://www.echological.com/jester/tank3.jpg (http://www.echological.com/jester/tank3.jpg)
http://www.echological.com/jester/tank4.jpg (http://www.echological.com/jester/tank4.jpg)


looks good   $925    now thats a lot of money   :shock:



edit:  these pictures are fairly large...  dialup beware
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: TLRam1 on September 29, 2008, 10:44:33 AM
Fixed - THe photo's are on the MOOT photobucket account under Magna Tank. When I made a separate folder for the photos it changed the Image address.
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on September 29, 2008, 10:45:42 AM
haha  i put up links before you fixed it  :-P
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: TLRam1 on September 29, 2008, 10:47:45 AM
That's because I was testing and double checking.  8-)
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on September 29, 2008, 10:52:52 AM
that's cool,  not everyone has their own web server. :lol:
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Magniac on September 29, 2008, 10:55:55 AM
You have to admit he does a heck of a job. It is a little pricey, but remember he does each one by hand himself, and it takes a long time to make them look that good.
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on September 29, 2008, 10:59:32 AM
does he need the old tank to sacrifice?
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Magniac on September 29, 2008, 11:17:03 AM
I think he will do it on an exchange basis. Check with him.
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on September 29, 2008, 11:19:40 AM
I just sent him an email asking my previous question,  I'll post his answer when it is received.

Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: thegoochking on September 29, 2008, 11:19:53 AM
Yea do we send him our old tank and go without riding till hes done or does he aquire the tanks and do the work on them. Im thinking of mybe getting one done. The price is a little steep though haha.
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: hootmon on September 29, 2008, 11:32:00 AM
I noted in the pictures that there are higher than stock risers, are they necessary for the larger tank?
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on September 30, 2008, 10:49:20 AM
Here is the response I got from Ian regarding the two previous questions...


Hi Jess:



Yes I do require your tank.  You pay for the shipping of your tank to me and I'll pay for the shipping of the new tank to you.  You do need risers to compensate for the wider and taller tank.  My risers came from this website: www.cycle-istic.com.   His name is Dobie – nice guy....



Oh by the way the tank is not 5 gallons its almost 6 gallons (you know that little extra gas goes a long way .....
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on October 01, 2008, 11:09:30 AM
here are some more pictures i received from Ian

http://www.echological.com/jester/tank5.jpg (http://www.echological.com/jester/tank5.jpg)
http://www.echological.com/jester/tank6.jpg (http://www.echological.com/jester/tank6.jpg)

also...

"The bike handling is not affected by the extra weight of tank. I think the magna rides better with a heavier tank – it corners really well – the tank weight is not a concern at all.  FYI, I require a $300.00 deposit before I start on a tank."   said Ian

Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: lragan on October 01, 2008, 11:33:56 AM
His statement about handling sort of makes sense to me.  Stock tank holds, what 2.5 gals?  At 6 lbs/gal = 15 lbs.  5 gals = 30 lbs.  The bike's suspension can easily handle riders from fly weight to, ummm..... much larger, so it doesn't seem an issue to me. 

What needs to go with this is a hydration pack and a relief tube... :cool:
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on October 01, 2008, 07:56:58 PM
you can buy foul weather gear for sailing that has a tube that you strap onto your hoohaw....a little tube runs down your leg don't see why that wouldn't work for a motorcycle!
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Chad in Michigan on October 01, 2008, 08:44:34 PM
Quote from: Jester on October 01, 2008, 07:56:58 PM
you can buy foul weather gear for sailing that has a tube that you strap onto your hoohaw....a little tube runs down your leg don't see why that wouldn't work for a motorcycle!

HA! That's funny :) It would be a site to see, driving behind somebody and trying to flag them down cause there is something leaking out of the bike. The guy on the bike sez, " Oh my bike's fine.. I had to pee' LOL
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Curtis_Valk on October 01, 2008, 09:36:59 PM
Do a search........."sneaky leaker".

Curtis
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on October 01, 2008, 11:56:49 PM
I don't really see the point though.....   If your out in the middle of no where you can just hop off the bike and pee on a rock.   If your in town, there is almost ALWAYS a mcdonalds....    I'd be worried the poor little sucker would SUFFOCATE!!  :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:  Besides,  who really wants to ride more than 200 miles without a break on the stock magna seat.   ouch. :P
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: dgc67 on October 02, 2008, 07:48:31 AM
QuoteHis statement about handling sort of makes sense to me.  Stock tank holds, what 2.5 gals?  At 6 lbs/gal = 15 lbs.  5 gals = 30 lbs.  The bike's suspension can easily handle riders from fly weight to, ummm..... much larger, so it doesn't seem an issue to me.

I agree, you are certainly right that the bike is designed to handle a variety of riders.  I was just thinking that the rider weight is centered on the suspension more evenly and that a larger tank will add that extra weight more over the front of the bike.

If you are NOT a peg dragger, which I am, it may not matter. But if you ARE a peg dragger and already know how your bike handles with your body weight on it, then when you first get this tank it will LIKELY take some experience to see if the "feel" of the bike has changed.  With a full tank it will most likely dive more upon braking and will also fall into the corners a little faster and might upset the front suspension just a little as you corner, especially if something forces you to brake while cornering.

Regardless, my main intent was more for the safety of whoever does get the larger tank, which I would love also, to be careful until you get used to the change.  Again, not trying to be an expert or factual on this.  I learned my lesson with the whole "octane" post and concede it may just be my opinion.  Just food for thought.   8-)
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on October 03, 2008, 07:32:20 PM
okay,  with a show of hands, who is going to get this fat tank?    :twisted:
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Curtis_Valk on October 03, 2008, 07:47:47 PM
Quote from: Jester on October 03, 2008, 07:32:20 PM
okay,  with a show of hands, who is going to get this fat tank?    :twisted:

No need, both mine are 6.9 gallon!  :mrgreen: :wink:

Curtis
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Jester on October 03, 2008, 09:26:48 PM
what's that a VALK.   Not goldwing like i previously had posted.
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: TLRam1 on October 03, 2008, 10:48:26 PM
Mine is enlarged a little already. That is a nice tank though.
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Charles S Otwell on October 04, 2008, 03:00:10 AM
Nice looking tank, but I'm not sure I like the Dolly Parton look on the Magna. It looks pretty well proportioned as it is. I do understand for all you Iron Butts, the need more fuel and less stops. Personally my candy a$$ needs to get off after a 100 miles anyway :D.
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: L J VFR on October 04, 2008, 04:42:50 AM
I will admit, if the price were a little lower, say $500 then I would probably have my tank off.  But at a grand, that is hard to stomach..(and tell my wife).  The only agervating thing is the bunch I ride with has it seems like 20 gallon tanks and never need fuel.. Then when I wave my hand and point down to my tank, they get that "here we go again look".   I guess we could all go the Jim route and put a tank on the back. :grin:
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: hootmon on October 04, 2008, 06:22:31 AM
Hey Jester, You asked - "okay,  with a show of hands, who is going to get this fat tank?"   

I haven't seen anybody jumping at this, so I thought I would help you guys out; Because we need to check the quality of the workmanship, length of time to complete, etc, etc...
I will sacrifice my tank, IF you guys take up a collection and pay for the work...
I know, I know, I'M making the biggest sacrifice here..  But for you guys, I'd do it just for your satisfaction of being able to recommend, or not recommend this product! SO, it's a sacrifice I'm willing to make just in honor of you (collectively - so to speak!!)


:?:   :idea:  :-?    :|  :)   :grin:   :lol:   :wink:
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: L J VFR on October 04, 2008, 07:12:59 AM
I wonder if the Valkna tank mod would be something cheaper??  But then we would have to buy a beat up valkyrie tank and fab it ourselves..  They do look good though.. Hmmm... :?
Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: lragan on October 04, 2008, 09:53:47 AM
I like the beer keg look that Jim has on his new prize.  I presume it is easy to leave off, as well.

Title: Re: Fat 5gal Magna Fuel Tank
Post by: Greg Cothern on October 05, 2008, 09:17:10 AM
I agree if it were lesser $$$ I would seriously think about one for the Project 96 as I think it would give it a nice beefy look!